Maureen Dowd's Op-Ed To Tweet or Not to Tweet got me thinking that it might behoove me to start tweeting if not just to experience first-hand another seismic shift in technological tectonics. Is Twitter just the latest and greatest avenue for celebrity chatter and self-aggrandizement? Is its popularity problematic evidence of society's shrinking attention span? Dowd asked Twitter's founders (whom she deemed quite charming unlike their invention): "Was there anything in your childhood that led you to want to destroy civilization as we know it?" And they laughed it off. But is this tweeting thing a laughing matter? Not sure yet. But if Oprah and Agent deem life tweetworthy, then maybe, just maybe, I can be convinced.
How's that for short and tweet? No, it's not under 140 characters. But it's a start.
[Okay: indulge this philosophic-meanderer in a few more characters, will you? An Earth Week Inquiry: Why is it that so many modern technological toys (think Apple, Mac, BlackBerry, Twitter) are named to conjure natural goodies -- like lush fruits and sweet birds? Is this meant to distract us from the fact that these are decidedly unnatural gadgets?]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Join the conversation. What do you think? Be honest. Be bold. Tell me I'm wrong. Tell me about that typo. Tell me I'm splendid. Or tell me I'm spoiled. But if you want your comment to be seen, keep it clean.